October 31, 2011
It took them a long time to get there but Clearwire finally has the pricing strategy I thought the company should have gone with out of the gate: A simple, one-price plan for mobile or home service, $50 a month, with no long-term contract necessary. It’s easy to understand and easy to purchase (especially with devices priced as low as $39.99) but — is it too late to matter?
When the nascent national wireless broadband service from Clearwire first became available back in January of 2009, the company had a pamphlet with so many different pricing options (dual plans, mobile + home plans, etc.) that it was hard to write simply just how much the new service would cost. And then Clearwire compounded that marketing problem by changing plans and pricing as it rolled out new markets — all under some claim of “finding out what works.”
What works — what always works — is easy and cheap. I always thought Clearwire should have started out selling a $25 per month plan just to see how many people it could sign up. That might sound business-stupid but how is it any worse than the grand plans of former CEO Bill Morrow, which crashed and burned? Inside Clearwire there were reportedly some renegades who wanted to try out a low-cost no-contract pricing scheme but by the time the Rover puck concept finally got greenlighted it didn’t have a passionate executive backing it so it predictably floundered.
Even as late as a year ago January I still thought a simple two-tier plan from Clearwire made sense, especially to get ahead of the tiered-data plans that were coming from Verizon and AT&T. But nobody listened then and instead we got grand plans for Clearwire smartphones and Clearwire Kindles, which resulted in the great Clearwire-Sprint executive collision, which hasn’t worked out well for either company.
Now you have a Clearwire without any of the leadership that brought the ISP to life — former CEO Ben Wolff, who for many Clearwire originals remained the soul of the firm, resigned from the board last week — and with a withered operational budget that leaves Clearwire no choice really but to strip down its offerings to a simple $50 a month plan, no contract, no download limits. My bet is that a bunch of data-hungry types will snap up these deals and run their laptops and iPads off a Clearwire pocketspot for the next few years, loving the last real unlimited wireless data contract around. It’s just a shame this strategy wasn’t tried sooner, when the company had some marketing muscle to put behind it.
No Comments » |
4G, CTIA, LTE, Wi-Fi, WiMAX | Tagged: 4G, Bill Morrow, Clearwire, Paul Kapustka, PocketSpot, Rover, Sidecut Reports, WiMAX |
Permalink
Posted by Paul
October 31, 2011

AT&T’s game of catch-up in the Long Term Evolution (LTE) networking game took a big leap forward today with the announcement of two LTE-capable smartphones for AT&T, Android-powered offerings from HTC and Samsung. AT&T also announced the addition of the next markets to get LTE service, a list that includes Boston, Washington D.C., Baltimore and Athens, Ga.
Though the LTE advancements are welcome for a nation looking for more high-speed networking what may be more significant to AT&T customers is a claim that the company says it has now completed the software and backhaul improvements to support its HSPA+ flavor of 4G over two-thirds of its coverage area, meaning that AT&T no longer has to call out its 4G markets like it did earlier this summer. When you now go to the AT&T 4G coverage map the only “new” markets highlighted are the ones with LTE or about to get LTE; there is no longer any pop-up distinction for the 4G HSPA+ coverage, like the map had earlier this year.
Though AT&T still won’t publish a list of HSPA+-enabled markets — we are still asking company spokespeople to point us to one, if one exists — our guess is now that the LTE launch is finally underway AT&T doesn’t have to play its we’ll-call-anything-4G game anymore. We’d still like to see a coverage map with more honesty, however, with actual tower locations and expected coverage speeds. But we’re not holding our breath.
No Comments » |
4G, LTE, Wi-Fi, WiMAX, Wireless | Tagged: 4G, AT&T, HSPA, HTC, LTE, Paul Kapustka, Samsung, Sidecut Reports |
Permalink
Posted by Paul
October 26, 2011
After seemingly kicking partner Clearwire to the curb a few weeks ago, Sprint Nextel brought its erstwhile 4G partner back into the limo Wednesday, announcing a deal to work with Clearwire on Long Term Evolution (LTE) network implementations in the future.
While there are no specifics yet, at the very least Sprint’s public re-embrace of the company that it is the majority owner of not only brought Clearwire’s stock back to life but it will probably make a lot of people stop wondering if Sprint was crazy for simply walking away from Clearwire and its huge stash of wireless spectrum. On a conference call to report earnings today, Sprint CEO Dan Hesse described the Clearwire deal in these words:
We’re pleased to announce that we have signed a non-binding cooperation agreement with Clearwire to work together on the technical specifications of the Clearwire LTE network and to ensure a superb customer experience to Sprint customers on the Clearwire LTE network. The cooperation extends to the design and operations of the network and ensure seamless handoffs and service layer control that meets Sprint’s customer experience requirements, cover the cell site selection and timing of site builds and involves working with OEMs to design devices and to include certain chipsets in devices.
As you should each understand, it was necessary to reach this agreement in order to clear the way to begin the negotiations of commercial terms under which Sprint may utilize and pay for access to the Clearwire LTE network. A definitive agreement will allow Sprint to meet its objective to further improve the customer experience and to manage its fixed network costs by offloading some 4G usage from its own LTE network on to the Clearwire LTE network and thereby benefit from Clearwire’s large spectrum portfolio on a resale basis.
Those discussions are ongoing and the terms resulting from those discussions, if any, will be disclosed only at such time that a definitive and binding agreement has been reached by the parties.
(Thanks to Seeking Alpha for the call transcript.)
While we don’t have time here at Sidecut Central to digest Sprint’s overall earnings picture today — Roger Cheng over at CNET has a pretty good breakdown of Sprint’s decent quarter and Hesse & Co.’s further clarity on iPhone costs — we are somewhat disappointed that Sprint didn’t break out any 4G subscriber add numbers like they did last quarter. We are guessing we will have to once again wait until Clearwire reports its numbers (scheduled for next week) to get more “color” on how many 4G devices Sprint activated during Q3. The unofficial number right now is 1.9 million, though Hesse did not say that Sprint gave Clearwire 1.9 million reasons to love Sprint this quarter. We are guessing, though, that the LTE deal is enough love for the Clearwire folks for right now.
No Comments » |
4G, LTE, WiMAX, iPhone | Tagged: 4G, Clearwire, LTE, Paul Kapustka, Sidecut Reports, Sprint, WiMAX |
Permalink
Posted by Paul